Brockman — affirmed the criminal judgment without a written opinion

Case
Patrick T. Brockman v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Conner (Rick Scott, 2011); KLINGENSMITH (Rick Scott, 2013)
Date Decided
July 23, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-1192
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Patrick T. Brockman appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County. Circuit Judge Howard Kelly Coates, Jr. presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 502022CF008532AXXXMB.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the charges, facts, procedural history, issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Judges Conner and Klingensmith and Associate Judge Charles A. Schwab concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the judgment below.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment intact. Because the appellate court supplied no facts, legal analysis, or explanation, the opinion does not identify the issue decided or articulate a rule of law for future cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top