Brown — First District affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Travis Rashaul Brown v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Bilbrey; Kelsey; M.K. THOMAS (Rick Scott, 2016)
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-0243
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Appellate Practice
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Travis Rashaul Brown appealed a judgment of the Circuit Court for Hamilton County. Circuit Judge David W. Fina presided over the lower-court proceeding.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the charges, facts, issues raised on appeal, or reasoning of the trial court.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation of its ruling. Judges Bilbrey, Kelsey, and M.K. Thomas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the judgment against Brown.
  • The decision was a per curiam affirmance without a written opinion.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rationale addressing the facts or legal issues raised in the appeal.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s judgment intact, subject to disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Because the court issued no written reasoning, the decision offers practitioners no substantive guidance about the underlying legal questions.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top