Brown v. State of Florida — Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied

Case
Keith Andrew Brown v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
NORTHCUTT (Lawton Chiles, 1997); KHOUZAM (Charlie Crist, 2008)
Date Decided
June 19, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-3127
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Certiorari, Circuit Court Review
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Keith Andrew Brown, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of certiorari challenging a decision of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, presided over by Judge Barbara Twine-Thomas. The Florida Second District Court of Appeal accepted jurisdiction over the certiorari petition and considered Brown’s challenge to the lower court’s ruling.

The Court’s Holding

The court denied Brown’s petition for writ of certiorari. The per curiam opinion provides no explanation for the denial, reflecting the court’s exercise of discretion in declining to exercise certiorari jurisdiction over the matter. Judges Northcutt, Khouzam, and LaBrit concurred in the denial.

Key Takeaways

  • The Florida Second District denied the certiorari petition without written explanation, exercising its discretionary gatekeeping authority.
  • The underlying circuit court decision remains undisturbed by this appellate action.

Why It Matters

Denials of certiorari petitions without explanation are routine appellate dispositions that do not establish precedent or provide guidance on the merits of the underlying dispute. This decision reflects the appellate court’s decision not to intervene in the trial court proceeding.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top