Bryant v. Dancy — Fourth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Travia Bryant v. Ronald Dancy
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gross; May; Ciklin
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-3321
Topics
Appeals, Family Law, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Travia Bryant appealed from a judgment or order entered by Judge Johnathan D. Lott of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-court matter as case number 062019DR001712AXXXCE but does not describe the dispute, the challenged ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

Bryant represented herself on appeal. Ronald Dancy was represented by Marck K. Joseph of The Joseph Firm, P.A.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision. Judges Gross, May, and Ciklin concurred.

The court provided no written reasoning, legal analysis, or explanation of the grounds for affirmance. The opinion therefore establishes only that the challenged ruling was left in place.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without an explanatory opinion.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends the appeal in Dancy’s favor unless further proceedings, such as a timely motion for rehearing, alter the result. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the decision offers no substantive guidance about the legal issues presented or the basis for affirmance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top