Brye v. State — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Quymine Cordarly Brye v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Bilbrey (Rick Scott, 2014); KELSEY (Rick Scott, 2015)
Date Decided
July 24, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1852
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance, Florida Courts
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Quymine Cordarly Brye appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Escambia County, where Judge John F. Simon, Jr. presided.

The appellate opinion does not identify Brye’s conviction, sentence, arguments on appeal, or the circuit court ruling under review. It also provides no factual or procedural history beyond identifying the lower court.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court supplied no reasoning or analysis and did not address any legal issue in writing. Judges Bilbrey, Kelsey, and M.K. Thomas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rule of law and discloses neither the issues raised nor the court’s reasoning.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the lower court’s decision in place, but the opinion’s lack of factual discussion or legal analysis limits its usefulness to attorneys seeking guidance on substantive or procedural questions.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top