Bussey v. State — Fifth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Kameron Desean Bussey v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lambert; Eisnaugle; Boatwright
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-1895
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kameron Desean Bussey appealed from the County Court for Duval County, where Judge James G.T. Nealis IV presided. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the issues raised, or the county court’s ruling.

Bussey was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office. The Florida Attorney General’s Office represented the State.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision. Judges Lambert, Eisnaugle, and Boatwright concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court provided no analysis or explanation for its ruling and did not identify the arguments presented on appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the county court’s decision.
  • The ruling was issued per curiam by a three-judge panel.
  • The opinion announced no legal reasoning or rule.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Bussey’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no written guidance about the underlying legal or factual issues. Its significance is therefore limited to the disposition reflected in the opinion.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top