Caldwell v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Patrick Caldwell v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gross; May; Ciklin
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
4D2024-1971
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Patrick Caldwell appealed from a proceeding in the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Michael A. Usan presided over the matter below, which was docketed as case number 062024CF003373A88810.

The Fourth District Court of Appeal’s brief opinion does not describe the facts, the legal issues Caldwell raised, or the specific ruling under review.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed. Judges Gross, May, and Ciklin concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court provided no reasoning or further explanation for its decision. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court proceeding’s outcome without identifying the particular ruling under review.
  • The per curiam opinion provides no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The disposition is not final until any timely filed motion for rehearing is resolved.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Caldwell’s appeal in the State’s favor at the district-court level, but its lack of reasoning limits what attorneys can draw from it about the underlying facts or legal questions.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top