Callaway v. State — First District affirms without written explanation

Case
Kimberly M. Callaway v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lewis; Kelsey; Treadwell
Date Decided
October 23, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-1306
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance, Pro Se Litigants
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kimberly M. Callaway, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Bay County, where Judge Shonna Young Gay presided. The State of Florida was the appellee.

The First District’s abbreviated opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. Judges Lewis, Kelsey, and Treadwell concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court provided no written reasoning or legal analysis. The opinion therefore establishes only that the judgment or order under review was affirmed, without revealing the basis for that result.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying claims, appellate issues, or substantive area of law.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal at the panel stage while leaving no written analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. The disposition was designated not final until resolution of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top