Cameron v. State — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Javares Cameron v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Bilbrey (Rick Scott, 2014); NORDBY (Ron DeSantis, 2019); Treadwell (Ron DeSantis, 2025)
Date Decided
August 13, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-0784
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Javares Cameron appealed from the Circuit Court for Bay County, where Judge Shonna Young Gay presided. The abbreviated appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the disposition under review, or Cameron’s arguments on appeal.

The State of Florida appeared as appellee. Judges Bilbrey, Nordby, and Treadwell considered the appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning, factual discussion, or analysis of the issues presented. All three panel judges concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court.
  • The decision was issued per curiam, with Judges Bilbrey, Nordby, and Treadwell concurring.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, legal issues, or basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves the appeal by affirmance but supplies no written analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top