Carbomoreno v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Andres Leonardo Carbomoreno v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; Villanti; Atkinson
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
2D2024-0578
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Andres Leonardo Carbomoreno appealed from the County Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Jeffrey M. Rich presided. The opinion does not describe the underlying charge, the challenged ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal resolved the case through a brief per curiam decision. The court provided no factual or procedural discussion beyond identifying the lower court and counsel.

The Court’s Holding

The Second District affirmed the county court’s judgment. Judges Northcutt, Villanti, and Atkinson concurred.

Because the court issued an unexplained affirmance, the opinion states no legal reasoning and announces no express rule of law. The text does not identify which issues were considered or the grounds on which the judgment was upheld.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the Hillsborough County court’s judgment.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion supplies no facts, appellate issues, or express legal rule.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s judgment in place but offers no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases. Its practical significance is therefore limited to the disposition of Carbomoreno’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top