Carpenter v. Princehorn — affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Malcolm Carpenter v. Krystal Princehorn, Individually, and o/b/o K.P., and K.P., Children
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
MAKAR; LAMBERT; HARRIS
Date Decided
November 3, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-2357
Topics
Family Law; Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Malcolm Carpenter appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Seminole County in a proceeding involving Krystal Princehorn, individually and on behalf of K.P., and K.P. The circuit-court case was presided over by Judge John L. Woodard, III.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the circuit court’s ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the applicable legal issues. Princehorn and the children made no appearance in the appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion. Accordingly, the decision supplies no reasoning or additional legal holding beyond leaving the appealed judgment intact.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the Seminole County Circuit Court’s decision.
  • The court provided no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • Judges MAKAR, LAMBERT, and HARRIS concurred in the disposition.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends the appeal in the appellees’ favor unless altered through an authorized post-decision motion or further review. Because the court did not explain its reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the underlying family-law issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top