Carson v. State — Fifth District affirmed in a Rule 3.800 appeal

Case
Marvin Gerald Carson v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
JAY, C.J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); Makar, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); Kilbane, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
September 22, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3441
Topics
Rule 3.800, Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Marvin Gerald Carson appealed from the Circuit Court for Sumter County in a proceeding identified as a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 appeal. Circuit Judge Mary Pavloff Hatcher handled the matter below.

Carson represented himself on appeal. The opinion does not describe the challenged ruling, Carson’s arguments, or the underlying facts.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. The court issued its decision per curiam without a written explanation.

Chief Judge Jay and Judges Makar and Kilbane concurred. The opinion states that the decision is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed in an appeal identified as arising under Rule 3.800.
  • The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the underlying ruling.
  • Chief Judge Jay and Judges Makar and Kilbane comprised the participating panel.

Why It Matters

The opinion establishes that the circuit court’s ruling was affirmed, but its summary disposition supplies no explanation of the legal or factual basis for that result. The text therefore does not support broader conclusions about the particular Rule 3.800 issue presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top