Casebolt v. Trax Federal Credit Union — affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Bryce Casebolt v. Trax Federal Credit Union
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Silberman; Kelly; Smith
Date Decided
September 4, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2437
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Bryce Casebolt appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Amy M. Williams presided. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, or the issues Casebolt raised on appeal.

Casebolt represented himself. Trax Federal Credit Union was represented by Brandon J. Tyler of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning. Judges Silberman, Kelly, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The opinion identifies no rule of law beyond the disposition of this appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal in Trax Federal Credit Union’s favor, but its one-word disposition offers no guidance about the underlying claims or the appellate court’s reasoning.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top