Casillas — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Daniel Mario Casillas v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
ROBERTS (Charlie Crist, 2007); NORDBY (Ron DeSantis, 2019)
Date Decided
August 5, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-0772
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Daniel Mario Casillas appealed a matter originating in the County Court for Union County, where Judge Mitchell D. Bishop presided. The State of Florida was the appellee.

The First District’s opinion provides no facts, procedural details beyond the court of origin, issues presented, or arguments raised by the parties.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed in a per curiam decision. Judges Roberts, Nordby, and Neff concurred.

The court supplied no written reasoning and did not identify the particular ruling under review. The opinion therefore establishes only that the appealed matter was affirmed, not the legal basis for that disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the matter on appeal from the County Court for Union County.
  • The decision was per curiam and unanimous among the three listed judges.
  • Because the court gave no reasoning, the opinion does not explain the facts, issues, or legal analysis supporting affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal at the First District unless altered through an authorized and timely post-decision motion or other available review. Its practical significance is limited to the affirmance because the court issued no explanatory opinion.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top