Castile — affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
Allen Castile v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
STARGEL (Ron DeSantis, 2023); WOZNIAK (Ron DeSantis, 2023)
Date Decided
July 28, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-1157
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Summary Affirmance; Postconviction Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Allen Castile appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for Lee County in lower-tribunal case number 20-CF-017245. The circuit court judge was Bruce Kyle.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The opinion does not identify Castile’s conviction, describe the underlying facts, specify the ruling challenged, or recount the arguments presented on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court issued a per curiam decision consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED” and provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues. Judges Stargel, Wozniak, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the Lee County circuit court’s ruling.
  • The appeal was brought under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • Because the court gave no explanation, the opinion states no legal rationale beyond the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place. Its practical significance is limited because the appellate court did not describe the dispute or articulate a legal rule.

The opinion also states that it is not final until the time to seek rehearing expires and any timely rehearing motion is resolved.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top