Background
Jose Marcos Castillo Padron appealed a non-final order entered by the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County in a family-court proceeding involving Bettsy B. Castellanos Barrera. Circuit Judge Christina Marie DiRaimondo entered the order under review.
Castillo Padron represented himself on appeal. Barrera was represented by Dieguez & Associates, PLLC, and Anthony Dieguez. The appellate opinion does not describe the substance of the underlying dispute, the terms of the non-final order, or the parties’ arguments.
The Court’s Holding
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s non-final order.
The per curiam opinion provides no reasoning, factual analysis, or statement of a legal rule. Accordingly, the decision establishes only that the challenged order was left undisturbed on this appeal.
Key Takeaways
- The Third District affirmed the non-final order from the Miami-Dade County Circuit Court.
- The decision was issued per curiam by Judges Fernandez, Miller, and Gooden.
- The opinion contains no explanation of the underlying dispute or the basis for affirmance.
Why It Matters
The ruling leaves the circuit court’s non-final order in effect. Because the opinion consists solely of an affirmance without explanation, it offers practitioners no articulated legal analysis or guidance beyond the result in this case.