Castro v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written opinion

Case
Mauricio Antonio Castro, Jr. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
TRAVER, C.J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); STARGEL, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); BROWNLEE, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023)
Date Decided
October 20, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-2285
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Mauricio Antonio Castro, Jr. appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for Orange County in lower-tribunal case number 2021-CF-002050. Circuit Judge Jenifer M. Harris presided below.

The appellate court’s disposition does not identify the offense, describe the underlying facts, state the issues Castro raised, or explain the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision. Chief Judge Traver and Judges Stargel and Brownlee concurred.

The court provided no written reasoning and announced no express rule of law. Its decision therefore establishes only that the judgment under review was affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the Orange County circuit court’s judgment.
  • The decision was unanimous and issued per curiam.
  • The opinion does not disclose the facts, appellate issues, or reasoning supporting affirmance.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends this stage of Castro’s direct appeal while leaving the trial court’s judgment intact, subject to any timely rehearing proceedings. Because the court issued an unexplained affirmance, the decision offers no substantive guidance on the legal questions that may have been presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top