Chapin v. State of Florida — Court affirmed lower court decision in summary order

Case
Dustin D. Chapin, Sr. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Date Decided
July 2, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-0346
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Appellate Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Dustin D. Chapin, Sr. appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Clay County (Judge Steven B. Whittington) in a criminal matter (trial case no. 2018-CF-001697-A). The Fifth District Court of Appeal accepted the appeal and reviewed the trial court’s judgment.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s decision without issuing a written opinion explaining its reasoning. The court issued a one-word per curiam order of affirmance, indicating agreement with the lower court’s judgment but providing no substantive legal analysis or discussion of the issues presented.

Key Takeaways

  • Summary affirmance with no written opinion limiting precedential value
  • Trial court judgment stands as the law of the case
  • Appellate judgment not final pending any timely motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331

Why It Matters

This summary affirmance provides no guidance on the legal issues or factual circumstances underlying the trial court’s judgment. Without a written opinion, the decision has minimal precedential impact and does not illuminate the court’s reasoning. Practitioners should review the trial court record and lower court opinion for the substantive legal framework.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top