Cooper v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Jamell M. Cooper v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lucas, C.J.; Northcutt, J.; Guard, J.
Date Decided
October 7, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-0653
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Postconviction Proceedings; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jamell M. Cooper appealed from a proceeding in the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Circuit Judge Thomas N. Palermo presided.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2), which governs certain appeals in postconviction proceedings without an evidentiary hearing. The Second District’s opinion does not describe Cooper’s claims, the circuit court’s ruling, or the underlying facts.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning. Chief Judge Lucas and Judges Northcutt and Guard concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • Because the court provided no written analysis, the opinion does not identify the issues presented or explain the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal with the circuit court’s ruling intact. Its practical significance beyond the parties is limited because the court did not provide facts, reasoning, or a legal rule for application in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top