Crawford v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Travis Crawford v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Rowe (Charlie Crist, 2009); WINOKUR (Rick Scott, 2015)
Date Decided
July 15, 2026
Docket No.
1D2024-2761
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Travis Crawford appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Circuit Judge Jennie Kinsey presided below.

The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the arguments Crawford raised, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The First District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the issues. Judges Rowe, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the claims raised on appeal or establish a stated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the judgment against Crawford in place, subject to disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no guidance about the merits of Crawford’s arguments or the legal basis for affirmance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top