Cross v. Hayes — Fifth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Joseph A. Cross v. Elizabeth Hayes
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
MAKAR; HARRIS; SOUD
Date Decided
August 18, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3540
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Joseph A. Cross, proceeding pro se, appealed from a decision of the County Court for Brevard County in litigation against Elizabeth Hayes. County Court Judge David Silverman presided below.

Hayes made no appearance in the appeal. The Fifth District’s opinion provides no facts about the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, or the arguments Cross raised.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court supplied no reasoning or legal analysis. Judges MAKAR, HARRIS, and SOUD concurred in the disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying facts, issues on appeal, or legal rules applied.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s ruling in place but offers no substantive guidance for attorneys or lower courts. Because the opinion contains only the disposition, no broader doctrinal holding can reliably be drawn from it.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top