Cruzado — Florida Sixth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Anthony Cruzado v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Nardella; Wozniak; Kamoutsas
Date Decided
September 15, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1750
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Postconviction Procedure; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Anthony Cruzado, proceeding pro se, appealed from the Circuit Court for Lee County, where Judge Joseph G. Foster presided over lower-tribunal case number 2019-CF-000162.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office. The appellate court’s opinion does not describe Cruzado’s claims, the circuit court’s reasoning, or the underlying facts.

The Court’s Holding

In a per curiam decision, the Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation for its decision. Judges Nardella, Wozniak, and Kamoutsas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in full.
  • The appeal was considered under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion states no legal rationale and announces no express rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling intact but offers no precedential analysis for attorneys or lower courts. Its practical significance is therefore limited to the disposition of Cruzado’s case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top