Cummings v. Florida — Fifth District affirms lower court decision without opinion

Case
Tyrone Cummings v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Date Decided
July 7, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3153 (LT Case 1993-CF-000566-B)
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Appellate Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Tyrone Cummings appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Marion County, where Judge Robert W. Hodges presided. The State of Florida opposed the appeal. The original case carried docket number 1993-CF-000566-B, indicating a criminal felony matter.

Cummings filed this pro se appeal to the Fifth District Court of Appeal, the intermediate appellate court for Florida’s Fifth Judicial Circuit.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court’s decision. The court issued a per curiam affirmance without written opinion, meaning no reasoned explanation for the affirmance was provided.

Key Takeaways

  • The lower court’s decision is affirmed and stands as final judgment.
  • This is a bare affirmance—no appellate reasoning is published.
  • Cummings’ appeal was unsuccessful on all grounds raised.

Why It Matters

Bare affirmances without opinion provide no guidance on the merits of the legal issues raised. Practitioners reviewing this decision cannot discern which arguments succeeded or failed. For pro se appellants like Cummings, the lack of written reasoning offers no basis for subsequent relief or further appeal based on appellate analysis.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top