Curran v. Baldo — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Mary Curran v. Federico Baldo
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lewis; Ray; M.K. THOMAS (Rick Scott, 2016)
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1921
Topics
Civil Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Mary Curran, proceeding without counsel, appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Taylor County. Circuit Judge Gregory S. Parker entered the decision under review, and Federico Baldo was the appellee.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition. Judges Lewis, Ray, and M.K. Thomas concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. The disposition was not final until resolution of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, legal issues, or basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place, subject to the disposition of any authorized post-decision motion. Because the First District supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive legal analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top