De Jesus v. State — affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a Rule 3.800 appeal

Case
Jose Santiago De Jesus v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Edwards; Eisnaugle; Soud
Date Decided
September 15, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-1894
Topics
Criminal Law; Rule 3.800; Appeals
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jose Santiago De Jesus, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Lake County in a matter identified as a Rule 3.800 appeal. Circuit Judge Cary F. Rada presided below.

The Fifth District’s opinion does not describe De Jesus’s arguments, the specific ruling under review, or the basis for the circuit court’s decision. The State made no appearance in the appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The per curiam opinion provides no reasoning, legal analysis, or description of the issues presented. Judges Edwards, Eisnaugle, and Soud concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in the Rule 3.800 appeal.
  • The opinion does not identify the precise issue raised or explain the basis for affirmance.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by a panel consisting of Judges Edwards, Eisnaugle, and Soud.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place. Because the opinion contains only an affirmance and supplies no reasoning, it does not explain how the court applied Rule 3.800 or resolve any articulated legal question.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top