De La Hoz — Third District summarily affirmed the circuit court

Case
Felix De La Hoz v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
Fernandez; Logue; Lindsey
Date Decided
October 8, 2026
Docket No.
3D26-1088
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Felix De La Hoz, representing himself, appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County in lower-tribunal case number F88-21370A. Circuit Judge Tanya Brinkley entered the ruling under review.

The State was represented on appeal by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Assistant Attorney General Haccord J. Curry. The appellate opinion does not identify the nature of the underlying ruling, the issues De La Hoz raised, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. Judges Fernandez, Logue, and Lindsey issued the decision per curiam.

The opinion consists solely of the disposition “Affirmed.” It provides no reasoning, legal analysis, or discussion of the facts and therefore states no broader legal rule beyond leaving the ruling under review intact.

Key Takeaways

  • The Third District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • De La Hoz proceeded without counsel on appeal.
  • The per curiam opinion provides no factual discussion or explanation of the court’s reasoning.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the Miami-Dade circuit court’s ruling in place. Because the Third District supplied no analysis, the opinion offers no stated rationale or substantive guidance for attorneys beyond the result in this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top