Deas v. Bell — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Kenneth Kyle Deas v. Steven Bell
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Bilbrey; M.K. THOMAS (Rick Scott, 2016); Long
Date Decided
September 3, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2577
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kenneth Kyle Deas appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Levy County, where Circuit Judge Craig C. DeThomasis presided. Deas represented himself on appeal, as did appellee Steven Bell.

The appellate court’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. Judges Bilbrey, M.K. Thomas, and Long concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court provided no written reasoning or legal analysis. The decision was designated nonfinal pending disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District left the Levy County circuit court’s decision in place.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion supplies no facts or legal analysis from which a broader holding can be derived.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves the appeal in Bell’s favor by affirming the judgment below, subject to any authorized post-decision motion. Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion offers no guidance on the underlying legal questions.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top