Delgado Fonseca v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Jorge Felix Delgado Fonseca v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
NARDELLA (Ron DeSantis, 2023); BROWNLEE (Ron DeSantis, 2023)
Date Decided
July 14, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-0072
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jorge Felix Delgado Fonseca appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Lee County in lower-tribunal case number 2023-CF-000923. Circuit Judge Bruce Kyle presided below.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not identify the offense, describe the underlying facts, state the issues raised on appeal, or discuss the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The court affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no written reasoning or legal analysis. Judges Nardella, Brownlee, and Gannam concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the judgment below.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rationale for rejecting the appellant’s claims.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s judgment intact. Because the appellate court supplied no factual discussion or legal reasoning, the opinion offers no express guidance on the substantive or procedural issues presented in the appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top