DeMarco — Sixth District affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Dustin DeMarco v. Nicole DeMarco
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
WOZNIAK (Ron DeSantis, 2023); SMITH (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
August 4, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1844
Topics
Family Law; Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Dustin DeMarco appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for Lee County in a domestic-relations case involving Nicole DeMarco. Circuit Judge Elisabeth Adams presided in the lower tribunal.

DeMarco represented himself on appeal. Nicole DeMarco did not appear. The appellate court’s opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the challenged ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning, legal analysis, or statement of the issues. Judges Wozniak, Smith, and Kamoutsas concurred in the disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling remains in effect.
  • The appellate court affirmed without a written explanation of its reasoning.
  • The opinion establishes no express legal rule beyond its disposition of this appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves the appeal in Nicole DeMarco’s favor by leaving the lower court’s ruling undisturbed. Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion offers no substantive guidance about the underlying family-law issues or the basis for affirmance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top