Dixon v. State — Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling without explanation

Case
William Shernel Dixon v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Khouzam; Black; Smith
Date Decided
September 23, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2956
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Postconviction Proceedings; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

William Shernel Dixon appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Elizabeth Gicella Rice presided. Dixon represented himself on appeal.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The appellate opinion does not identify Dixon’s underlying conviction, describe his claims, or explain the circuit court’s ruling.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court issued a per curiam decision consisting only of the affirmance and provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented. Judges Khouzam, Black, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District left the circuit court’s ruling in place.
  • The decision supplies no factual or legal analysis explaining the affirmance.
  • The appeal was brought under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2), with Dixon proceeding pro se.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Dixon’s appeal but offers no written reasoning for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases. Its practical effect is limited to preserving the challenged circuit court ruling.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top