Dority v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Lawrence Dority v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Mize; Brownlee; Kamoutsas
Date Decided
October 27, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-2357
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Lawrence Dority appealed a judgment of the Circuit Court for Orange County, where Circuit Judge Greg A. Tynan presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal proceeding as case number 2022-CF-005250-A-O.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the charges, procedural history, arguments on appeal, or reasoning of the circuit court.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation for the affirmance. Judges Mize, Brownlee, and Kamoutsas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the judgment against Dority.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written opinion explaining the court’s reasoning.
  • The opinion was not final until the period for seeking rehearing expired and any timely rehearing motion was resolved.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place but supplies no substantive appellate analysis. Because the court did not explain its reasoning or address the issues raised, the opinion offers no articulated rule of law for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top