Dukes v. CWIS — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Jason Dukes v. CWIS, LLC, Ofori and Associates, PC, Top Source Realty, LLC, A Plus Home Pro, LLC, and Snow Enterprises
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
MAKAR (Ron DeSantis, 2023); LAMBERT (Rick Scott, 2014); MacIver (appointment info not available)
Date Decided
August 13, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-0840
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jason Dukes appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Clay County in litigation against CWIS, LLC, Ofori and Associates, PC, Top Source Realty, LLC, A Plus Home Pro, LLC, and Snow Enterprises. Circuit Judge Steven B. Whittington presided below.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the trial court’s ruling, or the arguments presented on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the facts or legal issues. Judges Makar, Lambert, and MacIver concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in place because the Fifth District affirmed it.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the substantive claims, appellate issues, or legal standards involved.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in favor of the appellees but supplies no written legal analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases.

Because the opinion does not disclose the underlying facts or issues, no broader substantive holding can reliably be attributed to the court.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top