Duran v. State — First District denies prohibition petition without explanation

Case
Eddie Lee Duran, Jr. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Roberts; Bilbrey; Nordby
Date Decided
September 24, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-2757
Topics
Writ of Prohibition; Original Proceedings; Florida Appellate Practice
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Eddie Lee Duran, Jr. filed an original proceeding in the Florida First District Court of Appeal seeking a writ of prohibition against the State of Florida.

The per curiam opinion does not describe the underlying case, the challenged judicial action, Duran’s arguments, or the State’s response.

The Court’s Holding

The First District denied Duran’s petition for a writ of prohibition.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the petition’s merits. Judges Roberts, Bilbrey, and Nordby concurred in the disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The court denied the petition for a writ of prohibition.
  • The decision was issued per curiam, with all three identified panel judges concurring.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rationale and supplies no facts about the underlying dispute.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends Duran’s request for prohibition in this original appellate proceeding, subject to disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Because the court issued an unexplained denial, the opinion offers no articulated legal analysis for attorneys to apply in other prohibition proceedings.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top