Edwards v. State — First District affirms without a written opinion

Case
Dexter Dewin Edwards v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
OSTERHAUS (Rick Scott, 2013); NORDBY (Ron DeSantis, 2019)
Date Decided
July 31, 2026
Docket No.
1D2024-2296
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Dexter Dewin Edwards appealed from the Circuit Court for Bradford County, where Circuit Judge James Matthew Colaw presided. The opinion does not describe the nature of the underlying case or identify the ruling presented for appellate review.

Edwards was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office. The First District issued a per curiam decision without discussing the parties’ arguments, the facts, or the applicable law.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed. Its disposition consists solely of the word “AFFIRMED,” so the opinion provides no explanation of the court’s reasoning or the grounds for its decision.

Chief Judge Osterhaus and Judges Nordby and Treadwell concurred. The decision was designated nonfinal pending disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the matter appealed from the Bradford County Circuit Court.
  • The per curiam opinion states no facts, legal analysis, or basis for affirmance.
  • All three identified panel members concurred in the disposition.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Edwards’s appeal at the First District without a written explanation of the governing law or its application. Because the opinion does not identify the underlying ruling or articulate any legal rationale, no broader substantive holding can be drawn from the text.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top