Elmore — affirmed the county court’s judgment without a written explanation

Case
Zachary Ray Elmore v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Soud; Kilbane
Date Decided
August 27, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3404
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Zachary Ray Elmore appealed from a decision of the County Court for Marion County in lower-tribunal case number 2025-MM-007456. County Judge Lori Cotton presided below.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charge, the county court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District affirmed the county court’s judgment in a per curiam decision. Judges Makar, Soud, and Kilbane concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or legal analysis, so the opinion establishes only that the judgment under review was affirmed. The disposition was not final until resolution of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the county court’s judgment.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by a three-judge panel.
  • Because the court gave no explanation, the opinion does not identify the appellate issues or announce a reasoned holding on any legal question.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s judgment in place but offers no written guidance for attorneys or lower courts. Its significance is therefore limited to the disposition of Elmore’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top