Espinosa v. State — Fourth District affirmed the criminal judgment without an opinion

Case
Carlos E. Espinosa v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gross (Lawton Chiles, 1995); LEVINE (Charlie Crist, 2009)
Date Decided
July 30, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-0484
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Carlos E. Espinosa appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Thomas J. Coleman presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 062023CF006927A88810.

Espinosa was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office. The appellate court’s decision does not describe the charges, the facts, the issues raised, or the trial court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Judges Gross, Levine, and Forst concurred, and the decision states that it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the judgment under review.
  • The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the appellate issues.
  • The opinion is not final until any timely filed rehearing motion is resolved.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment intact. Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion provides no substantive guidance on the legal or factual issues presented in the appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top