Fabre v. Mederick — Third District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Guerdy William Fabre v. Rose Mederick
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
Fernandez; Logue; Miller
Date Decided
October 15, 2026
Docket No.
3D25-2387
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Guerdy William Fabre appealed from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County in a proceeding involving appellee Rose Mederick. The appeal arose from lower-tribunal case number 22-24338-CA-01, before Circuit Judge Spencer Eig.

The Third District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court ruling under review, the arguments presented on appeal, or the applicable law.

The Court’s Holding

A three-judge panel of the Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the ruling under review.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance consisting only of the word “Affirmed.” It provided no reasoning and did not identify the specific basis for its disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The Third District affirmed the circuit court ruling under review.
  • The opinion does not identify whether that ruling was a judgment or another appealable order.
  • The court supplied no factual discussion, legal analysis, or explanation for the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this stage of the appeal in Mederick’s favor, subject to the disposition of any timely motion for rehearing. Because the court did not explain its reasoning or describe the ruling under review, the opinion offers no substantive guidance beyond the result in this case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top