Fant v. State — affirmed the county court’s judgment without a written explanation

Case
Frank James Fant v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
NARDELLA (Ron DeSantis, 2023); WHITE (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
July 28, 2026
Docket No.
6D2023-2866
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Frank James Fant appealed from the County Court for Polk County, where Judge Hope M. Pattey presided over lower-tribunal case number MM23-002646-BA.

The appellate opinion does not describe the charge, the underlying facts, Fant’s arguments, or the county court’s ruling in detail.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED” and provided no legal analysis or explanation of its reasoning. Judges Nardella, White, and Gannam concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s judgment remains in place.
  • The appellate court did not identify or address Fant’s arguments in a written analysis.
  • The decision was unanimous among the three judges listed as concurring.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Fant’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no written reasoning for use in evaluating the underlying legal issues. Its significance is therefore principally case-specific: it leaves the county court’s judgment undisturbed.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top