Feldwick v. Landstar Lakeland — affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Raymond D. Feldwick v. Landstar Lakeland, Inc. and The Morgan Creek Preserve Residents’ Association, Inc.
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Wozniak; Mize; Pratt
Date Decided
August 18, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1571
Topics
Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Practice
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Raymond D. Feldwick appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Polk County in litigation against Landstar Lakeland, Inc. and The Morgan Creek Preserve Residents’ Association, Inc. Circuit Judge Jennifer A. Swenson presided in the lower tribunal.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the applicable legal standards.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court supplied no reasoning or legal analysis. Judges Wozniak, Mize, and Pratt concurred in the affirmance.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in effect.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion establishes no articulated rule of law and does not disclose the grounds for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The disposition ends the appeal at the Sixth District Court of Appeal unless further proceedings, such as a timely rehearing request, alter the result. Because the opinion contains no reasoning, it offers no substantive guidance about the parties’ dispute or the legal issues presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top