Felton v. State — Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling without a written explanation

Case
Robert C. Felton v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Eisnaugle; Soud; MacIver
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0488
Topics
Criminal Procedure; Rule 3.800; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Robert C. Felton, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Lake County in a matter identified as a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 appeal. Circuit Judge Cary Frank Rada entered the ruling under review.

The State of Florida made no appearance in the appeal. The Fifth District’s opinion does not describe Felton’s arguments, the circuit court’s reasoning, or the specific sentencing issue presented.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court issued a per curiam decision consisting only of the affirmance and provided no explanation of its reasoning. Judges Eisnaugle, Soud, and MacIver concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in Felton’s Rule 3.800 appeal.
  • The opinion provides no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The decision was per curiam, with Judges Eisnaugle, Soud, and MacIver concurring.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no written reasoning that attorneys can apply to other Rule 3.800 proceedings. Its significance is therefore limited to the disposition of Felton’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top