Ferreira v. Sondler — Fourth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Elizangela De Lima Ferreira v. Steven Michael Sondler
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Forst; Shepherd; Shaw
Date Decided
October 15, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-1871
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Elizangela De Lima Ferreira appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Daniel A. Casey presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 062023CA008417AXXXCE.

The Fourth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the trial court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the appellate arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion. Judges Forst, Shepherd, and Shaw concurred.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the merits. The opinion stated that it would not become final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment or order was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion was subject to any timely filed motion for rehearing before becoming final.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision intact. Because the Fourth District did not explain its reasoning or identify the issues presented, the opinion supplies no substantive legal analysis for application in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top