Figueroa Sanchez — Conviction affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Pedro Figueroa Sanchez v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
STARGEL (Ron DeSantis, 2023); WOZNIAK (Ron DeSantis, 2023)
Date Decided
July 21, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-1077
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Pedro Figueroa Sanchez appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Polk County in lower tribunal case number CF21-007148-XX. Circuit Judge Michelle O. Pincket presided below.

The appellate opinion does not identify the offense, describe the underlying facts, state the issues raised on appeal, or discuss the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Judges Stargel, Wozniak, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The opinion identifies no particular argument, statute, or precedent as the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Figueroa Sanchez’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no written reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore principally case-specific.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top