Filomena v. Law Offices of Steven S. Farbman — Third District summarily affirmed the judgment

Case
Sabrina Filomena v. Law Offices of Steven S. Farbman, P.A., et al.
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
LOGUE; LOBREE; BOKOR
Date Decided
September 3, 2026
Docket No.
3D24-1412
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Sabrina Filomena, representing herself, appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County in lower-tribunal case number 22-22694-CA-01. Circuit Judge Valerie R. Manno Schurr presided below.

The appellate opinion identifies the Law Offices of Steven S. Farbman, P.A., and others as appellees but does not describe the underlying claims, the trial court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s decision.

The per curiam opinion consists solely of the word “Affirmed” and provides no reasoning, legal analysis, or explanation of the issues decided.

Key Takeaways

  • The Third District affirmed the judgment or order under review.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by Judges Logue, Lobree, and Bokor.
  • Because the opinion contains no analysis, it does not identify the governing legal rule or explain the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the trial court’s ruling in place but offers no written guidance for litigants or lower courts. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top