Fitzsimmons v. State — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Michael Fitzsimmons v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Rowe; Nordby; Long
Date Decided
November 4, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1450
Topics
Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Michael Fitzsimmons, representing himself, appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Leon County. Circuit Judge Lance E. Neff entered the decision under review.

The First District’s opinion does not identify the underlying claims, facts, or issues raised on appeal. The State was represented by the Florida Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition. Judges Rowe, Nordby, and Long concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues. The opinion states that it is not final until the disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in place.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, claims, or appellate arguments.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Fitzsimmons’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no substantive analysis. As a result, the opinion establishes only that the lower court’s decision was affirmed and does not explain the legal basis for that result.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top