Flemmings v. Thompson — Fourth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Audi Flemmings v. Cian Thompson
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gross (Lawton Chiles, 1995); LEVINE (Charlie Crist, 2009)
Date Decided
July 30, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-3462
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam, Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Audi Flemmings appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Christopher Wigand presided over the lower-court case, docketed as No. 062024DRO020575AXXXCE.

Flemmings represented himself on appeal. Cian Thompson made no appearance. The appellate opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the order under review, the arguments raised, or the relevant facts.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning, legal analysis, or description of the issues decided. Judges Gross, LEVINE, and ForstT concurred. The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The per curiam opinion supplied no explanation for the affirmance.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, appellate issues, or legal grounds supporting the result.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the appellee’s favor, subject to the disposition of any timely rehearing motion. Because the court issued an unexplained affirmance, the opinion offers no substantive analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top