Flores v. Barclays Bank Delaware — Fourth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Alex Flores v. Barclays Bank Delaware
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
FORST; SHEPHERD; LOTT
Date Decided
October 15, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-0847
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance, County Court
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Alex Flores, appearing pro se, appealed from a proceeding in the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. County Court Judge Michele McCaul Ricca presided over the matter below.

Barclays Bank Delaware was the appellee and made no appearance in the appeal. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, or the arguments Flores raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the facts or legal issues. Judges Forst, Shepherd, and Lott concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the county court without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying claims, the precise ruling appealed, or the appellate issues.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Flores’s appeal in Barclays Bank Delaware’s favor at the Fourth District. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no stated legal analysis or rule concerning the underlying dispute.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top