Flores v. State — Florida appeals court summarily affirmed

Case
Carlos Flores v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Wozniak; Gannam; Kamoutsas
Date Decided
September 29, 2026
Docket No.
6D2026-0699
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Summary Affirmance; Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Carlos Flores, proceeding pro se, appealed from the Circuit Court for Polk County in lower-tribunal case number 2021-CF-005739-A000-XX. Circuit Judge Brenda P. Ramirez entered the order under review.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The Sixth District’s opinion does not describe Flores’s claims, the circuit court’s reasoning, or the underlying facts.

The Court’s Holding

In a per curiam decision, the Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation for its decision. Judges Wozniak, Gannam, and Kamoutsas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling without a written opinion.
  • The appeal was handled under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion does not identify the issues raised or establish a stated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no substantive guidance for other cases. Attorneys cannot determine from the opinion itself why Flores’s arguments failed or how the court evaluated them.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top