Florida v. Jenkins — affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
State of Florida v. David Bland Jenkins
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Silberman; LaRose; Guard
Date Decided
August 21, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1129
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

The State of Florida appealed a ruling involving David Bland Jenkins from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County. Circuit Judge Dana M. Moss entered the ruling under review.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the circuit court’s ruling, the legal issues raised, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court issued a per curiam decision consisting only of the word “Affirmed.” It provided no reasoning or explanation of the grounds for its decision. Judges Silberman, LaRose, and Guard concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The State’s appeal did not result in reversal of the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was unanimous among the three identified panel members.
  • Because the opinion contains no reasoning, it does not identify the legal rule or factual basis supporting affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place. Its practical significance beyond the parties cannot be assessed from the opinion because the court did not disclose the underlying issue or explain its reasoning.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top