Background
Shelton Reginald Floyd appealed from a proceeding in the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County before Judge Miguel Manuel de la O. The lower-tribunal case number was F25-25083.
The Third District Court of Appeal conducted the appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Floyd appeared on his own behalf, and the Florida Attorney General represented the State.
The Court’s Holding
In a per curiam opinion, the Third District affirmed the circuit court’s disposition.
The opinion supplied no factual discussion or legal analysis beyond identifying the appeal as an Anders proceeding and stating that the judgment was affirmed.
Key Takeaways
- The Third District conducted the appeal under the Anders procedure.
- The three-judge panel issued a unanimous per curiam affirmance.
- The opinion identified no reversible issue and provided no substantive analysis.
Why It Matters
The decision leaves the circuit court’s disposition intact. Because the opinion consists solely of an affirmance and contains no explanation of the facts or governing law, it offers little guidance beyond the outcome of Floyd’s appeal.