Foster v. State — First District Court of Appeal affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Winston Foster v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; M.K. Thomas, J.; Treadwell, J.
Date Decided
October 14, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2136
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Winston Foster appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Escambia County, where Judge John F. Simon, Jr., presided.

The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the arguments raised on appeal, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the issues. Chief Judge Osterhaus and Judges M.K. Thomas and Treadwell concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the issues raised or disclose the underlying facts.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top